What this workshop runs hayloft leaves out on purpose

Longer method note · checked 6 November 2026.

Why omit store ratings on workshop runs pages?

These builds are hosted here. There is no public Play or App Store card to scrape. Inventing 4.2 stars would turn the hayloft into a doorway we refuse to be.

Why skip download counters?

Same reason. A fabricated “1M+” teaches the wrong lesson about evidence. When a number is absent, we write that it is absent.

Do we hide monetisation?

We describe what the play pages we ship actually do. They do not open a checkout. If that changes, the review changes with a date.

Is affiliation claimed anywhere?

No. Footer and legal pages state we are not affiliated with stores or third-party developers. Build names belong to their owners.

What about retention charts?

We do not publish cohort graphs we cannot re-run. A workshop run review stays at the level of a cold session we can repeat.

How do corrections work?

Email the desk. Material fixes get a dated note in Dispatches and an edit on the affected page.

Why does omission matter for workshop runs SEO copy?

Headings carry the keyword as natural phrasing. Body text stays readable without stuffing “best free download 2026” constructions we ban on this desk.

Where is the positive list?

On the ranking: three hosted builds, play links, reviews, and a checked date. That is the whole claim.